Why I’m leaving Twitter

Update: I’m back on Twitter now after realizing that walking away from things like this doesn’t make them better. So I’ll do what I can to raise the level of conversation and stand against things I see as wrong. And for what it’s worth, Twitter did seem to zap the account used to do the worst of the threatening against Wu. So maybe they’re not as culpable as I suspected.

Brianna Wu is the head of a small game development company. They make a cool iOS game called Revolution 60.

Tonight, she started getting death threats on Twitter from a sad little man who feels threatened by her very existence. But in this case, he tweeted her home address and stated that he was coming over with a large knife, intending violence to Brianna and her family.

Twitter did nothing.

When others tried to bring this to Twitter’s attention, those reports were automatically rejected. Brianna called the police and left her home, and I hope she’s safe.

But as long as Twitter allows this kind of assault (and yes, threatening violence is itself a crime, separate from battery) to go on, I can’t be a part of that community. It’s for the same reason that I left Reddit, and I haven’t returned there either. I’ll miss some of the people I got to know on Twitter, but I have to draw the line somewhere.

Will Twitter even notice my lack of participation? Of course not. But all I can do is take my time and attention elsewhere. Your time and attention is all Twitter has, and their entire business depends on keeping it. I’m taking mine away, and if enough people get fed up and do the same, maybe they’ll notice. Maybe they’ll change. Maybe Twitter will become a place where people can feel safe again.

But until that happens, I won’t be there. Anyone who wants to talk to me can do so the old fashioned way, by sending an email to jeff@kirv.in.

How I learned to stop tweetmarking and love the stock Twitter app

Federico Viticci dropped a bombshell on last week’s Connected podcast. He uses the Twitter app from Twitter, not Tweetbot or Twitterrific.

And so do I.

I realize this is sacrilege to many of you. The stock Twitter app is a ruined, sad descendent of Loren Brichter’s legendary Tweetie, you say. It’s chock full of ads, it doesn’t sync timelines, list support is hidden under the gear menu on your profile page. Those things are true. And if you obsessively read every single tweet in your timeline every single day, the default Twitter experience is not for you.


As the boys on Connected pointed out, the ship may have already sailed. “Twitter Fabric” might kill third party Twitter apps as we know them. That would certainly explain why Tapbots still doesn’t have an iOS 7 version of the iPad version of Tweetbot now that we’re on iOS 8. Just not worth putting that much time and effort into a product someone else can kill with a press release.

But for the time being, third party Twitter apps aren’t dead. So why have I abandoned them?

Because life is too short to read every tweet, or every news article for that matter. Yes, I know all about Dunbar’s number, and I’m following less than 200 Twitter accounts. Many of those are news sources like Lifehacker and iMore. And with Twitter’s threaded conversations feature, I feel confident I can start at the top of my feed, read down until I either run out of time or see tweets I’ve already seen, and go about my business. Yes, tweet storms are more annoying this way, and frankly, I’m considering unfollowing a few people that habitually string one idea across several tweets. But for the most part, I keep up.

Anything I want to read later gets favorited, which IFTTT then dumps into Evernote (which has replaced bookmarking or read later services like Pocket and Pinboard for me), but I’ve noticed that with this more casual attitude towards my news, I actually pause and read articles inline much more often than I did with any RSS reader. It’s relaxing.

Am I missing things along the way? Almost certainly. But nothing essential. If a news story is that big, it will show up over and over in my feed (and sometimes even if it’s downright stupid, like “Bendghazi”). I’ve experienced surprisingly little FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and had a lot more time to do things that really matter, like writing or reading in iBooks.

Try it yourself for a week. You might be surprised how much time and anxiety you save.

Observations from a new Mac user

So, a few weeks ago, I bought my first Mac. It’s a 13″ retina MacBook Pro, and it is without a doubt the finest computer I’ve ever owned. But, given that I’m coming from the Windows world — with diversions to Chrome OS and Linux — a lot of things required just a bit of adjustment. Not nearly as much as I’d feared, though. So here are a few things I’ve noticed about switching to the Mac.

  • Retina matters. OMG the screen on this thing. This is the first laptop I’ve ever seen where I can’t see the screen door effect between the pixels. While I’m running at the equivalent zoom of 1280×800 on this 13″ screen, the text and icons are so crisp and clean that it makes going back to my iPad 2 feel like sandpaper on my eyes. I can see replacing the iPad and my iPhone 5S entirely with a larger iPhone 6 and just using that and my MacBook Pro going forward.
  • Thin and light. Speaking of which, the 13″ MacBook Pro is only 8 ounces heavier than the 13″ MacBook Air. And with the all day battery life in Mavericks/Yosemite, I can see taking this laptop with me almost everywhere. And the SSD is not only blisteringly fast, but the no-moving-parts thing means I can tote this around with impunity.
  • See above. Those two factors fundamentally change the way I approach personal computing. With this screen, light weight and no worries about battery life, this is the first laptop that I’ve felt can really be my primary computing device, a role previously filled by smartphones. For the first time I understand people like @ismh for whom the iPhone is a peripheral device secondary to their Mac.
  • ⌘Q is your friend. The biggest problem I’ve had adjusting to the Mac is getting that closing a window doesn’t necessarily close the app. Sometimes it does (Reminders, Calibre) and sometimes it doesn’t (Safari, iTunes), allowing the main app to keep running in the background with no visible windows. I’m having to get int the habit of closing apps with ⌘Q instead of clicking on the red X with my mouse.
  • Yosemite makes more sense to Windows users. The behavior of the green “traffic light” control in Mavericks baffled me. As I understand it, it toggled between the standard, developer-selected window size for a window and the user-selected size, which was often but not always maximized to take up as much of the screen as possible without overlapping the Menu Bar or Dock. That’s a little wishy-washy. In Yosemite, it toggles between full-screen view and windowed, which is not only more consistent, but is also closer to the maximize behavior from Windows, Linux and Chrome OS. And on a 13” screen, a find a lot of benefits to running big applications like Evernote and Omnifocus in full screen.
  • The Menu Bar is a great idea. I wasn’t sure how I’d like having a constantly mutating single menu bar at the top of the screen rather than each window having its own. #Turnsout this does work better, mostly because of Fitts’ Law. That, and the consistency Apple enforces in where certain universal menu items are going to be. “File, Edit, View” is always going to be “File, Edit, View.”
  • Apps are expensive, unless they’re not. A lot of the apps I use on my Mac are the same apps I used on my Windows laptop: Evernote, iTunes, Kindle, Calibre, Lord of the Rings Online, etc. And most of these are free. But when apps do cost money on the Mac, they’re often significantly more expensive than their Windows counterparts. Omnifocus was $40, and I still can’t create custom perspectives (that’s another $40 in-app purchase). Pixelmator was $30, but that’s still a hell of a lot cheaper than Photoshop. Tweetbot for Mac is $20, and doesn’t support many of the features found in the much cheaper iPhone version. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not opposed to paying for software I find useful or entertaining. And for-pay Mac software is wonderfully free of the nagware you often find in free Windows programs. But it’s an adjustment.
  • You need less software. Something else to consider is that you typically need less software on a Mac beyond what Apple gives you. I get Pages, Numbers and Keynote out of the box. Yes, I bought Scrivener for $45, but I could have used Pages if I wanted to. I’m still on the fence about Omnifocus versus iCloud reminders and Fantastical. And system utilities are much more rare. The only must-have icons in my Menu Bar are Evernote, BetterSnap Tool (which gives me Aero-like half and half tiling of app windows) and 1Password. Right now I have Alfred and Dropbox as well, but those will go away by the time Yosemite ships, replaced by Spotlight and iCloud Drive.
  • The stock apps are very good. In Mavericks, and even more in Yosemite, the stock Apple apps are pretty awesome if you’re already “all in” with Apple. Mail.app works great for me, but I’m using iCloud mail, not Gmail. Same for iCal, Reminders, Messages and Safari. In fact, I’ve found with the Reading List and synced tabs between my Mac and iOS devices, I don’t need Pocket or Pinboard anymore at all.
  • It just works. I know that’s a cliché, and sometimes it doesn’t just work. But most of the time, yeah, it does. There are so many little details, tiny touches in OS X that just work better than doing the same thing in Windows. Clicking ⌥Notification Center toggles Do Not Disturb. You can get to any special character right from the Edit menu in any app, or by typing ⌃⌘Space. And don’t get me started on Services, which are much better than monkeying with the “Send To” menu in Windows.

So far, enjoying the heck out of being a Mac owner, and I’m just getting started. Further updates as events warrant.

Stop the ecosystem, I want to get off

Ecosystems are starting to bug me.

I’m losing track of which of my stuff is where. Remember when apps were apps, and not cogs in some greater ecosystem? When all your data could be in one place? It was nice, wasn’t it? I miss that.

Today, my digital stuff is scattered all over the place. I have some movies and TV in Amazon’s cloud, and others in Apple’s. I have music collections with Apple, Google, Amazon, Rdio and Spotify, and have long lost track of what playlist I created where. I have all my ebooks and audiobooks on Amazon, except for the handful I have with Apple and the now woefully out of date un-DRMed backup in Calibre on Dropbox (or did I move that to Google Drive?). 

Speaking of which, my actual documents are an even bigger mess. I have blizzards of similar but slightly different collections in Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive and Evernote. When I actually need something, I have no idea where to look. Or if the version I find is current.

And it’s not like I can just pick one and stick with it. Thanks to the miracle of cloud storage, everyone wants to silo my data, segregating it where they can control it. My artwork lives in Adobe’s Creative Cloud (unless I didn’t create it in Photoshop). My Word documents have to be on OneDrive, or I can’t edit them on my iPad or my Chromebook (neither the web nor iOS Office apps support keeping your files in Dropbox).

This makes the file format confusion of two decades ago look quaint by comparison. At least .doc files and .jpg files could live in the same folder if they were related to the same project. Now not only are things tied to the app that created them, but they’re physically segregated to the apps, or ecosystems, that own them. Because under this model, you the user damn sure don’t own them. 

Don’t get me wrong. I get a lot more done now with my iPhone than I did 20 years ago with a DayTimer. But I miss knowing where my data was. 

My iPhone 5S is the most powerful computer I own

This kind of threw me for a loop. My A7-powered iPhone is the strongest, fastest computer currently in my possession. It not only easily outclasses my two A5-based iPads (an iPad 2 and first-gen mini), but it’s also more powerful than my Acer Chromebook or Windows laptop based on a 3-year-old AMD E-350 APU.

There’s been a lot of talk lately about the decline of the iPad and tablets generally, that they’re not selling the way they used to. While I think this is mostly overblown, I will confess that I do a lot more with my phone than I do my tablets. Not only is the phone always with me, but thanks to the A7 it’s powerful enough to handle a lot of tasks I used to require a PC for, like photo editing (not painting, which still needs a bigger screen, but I don’t know how much bigger; I’d love to try Procreate on a 5.5″ iPhone).

For all intents and purposes, my iPhone is my “primary” computer. The iPads rarely leave the house, and the Chromebook is mostly used as an RDP terminal to remote into my always-powered and headless Windows laptop. They’re all special use computers, though. For most of my work, my iPhone is not only the right tool for the job, it’s the most powerful tool I have.

Do one thing well

It’s one of the fundamental adages of Unix programming. It’s better to do one thing well than many things badly. This is why traditional Unix programs tend to be small and focused on single tasks and get chained together into workflows. Awk does the pattern recognition, but Sed actually changes the text file.

While iOS is Unix under the hood, iOS apps are considerably more complex. But, it occurred to me, they don’t have to be  too complex. So I started looking at my phone (and tablet) to see where I was using apps that were a dessert topping and a floor wax but weren’t terribly good at either.

The biggest culprit was Evernote. I was using Evernote to do almost everything. It was my archival storage, journal, word processor, task list, shopping list, etc. I’ve been told to beware of “everything buckets” because they’re typically one-way black holes that data goes into and is never seen again. I can attest that this is true. Despite my best intentions, stuff I put into Evernote effectively disappeared until I searched specifically for it. It’s good for reference, but not skimming. 

So I decided to break out what I was using Evernote for into discrete applications that were specialists at what I wanted to do. 

Day One is my new journal and it works so much better. Journaling in Evernote was a chore I rarely got around to. Journaling in Day One is fun, and it’s easy to scan back over recent history to jog my memory.

Simplenote is my new notes app. When I need to jot something down or look something up, it’s just faster because it’s all plain text. No notebooks, less than a dozen tags. 

Dropbox is my filesystem. This was a close duel between Dropbox and Google Drive. Drive offers 10x the storage for the same price, and Google doesn’t have torture-proponent Condi Rice on their board of directors. But, ultimately I had to be practical. The apps I want to use support Dropbox and very few of them support Drive. If this should change, I may revist this. 

I update my blogs in Squarespace Blog. There’s no point in writing them somewhere else and copy/pasting them over. I just store half-finished work on Squarespace as unpublished drafts and edit them over time.

I keep bookmarks and read-later content in Pinboard, using Pinner on iOS. I decided on Pinboard because I was getting out of Evernote and Pocket isn’t really an archival/bookmarking service. Also, I really appreciate that Pinboard, unlike Pocket, has a discernable business model. I’m more than willing to pay for services I use if that keeps them around. 

I write fiction in Storyist. This was updated for iOS 7 recently and most of my complaints are no longer valid. Because it’s designed specifically for writing screenplays and manuscripts, it’s got all the features I couldn’t find in Pages, Word or Google Docs, and none of the cruft I don’t need. When the time comes to work with my editor, I can export from Storyist to Google Drive, but for drafting I’ll stick to a specialist app. (and yes, I’ll consider Scrivener if/when the iOS version ever comes out) 

I’ve also gone back to basics for a lot of functions where I used to use third party apps. I’ve gone back to Messages instead of third party messaging clients, the iOS Mail app instead of Gmail, Music and iTunes Radio instead of Spotify or Rdio, Safari instead of Chrome. I’m using Fantastical instead of the native Calendar and Reminders apps because there is a value to seeing my tasks and events on the same screen, but I’m not married to the idea. I’ve also ditched all my RSS readers and just read a “News” list on Twitter in Tweetbot with the same sources. 

How can you simplify your workflows? 

Not sure if want

We’ve seen a lot of cool stuff from Microsoft recently, first with the iPad Office announcement and then with the BUILD conference. New CEO Satya Nadella comes from Microsoft’s cloud division, and with him in charge and Ballmer gone, Microsoft looks like they might be serious about going from “a PC on every desk” to “Microsoft services on every device,” no matter who makes that device or what OS it runs.

So I started wondering. Could I be happy with Apple hardware, Apple media (aside from Kindle, because really, Apple, iBooks is embarrassing) and Microsoft services? I decided to find out.

Yesterday I signed up for a free month of Microsoft’s Office 365. This gives me the ability to edit data on documents in my Microsoft OneDrive via the iPhone, iPad and the web on my Chromebook. I have calendars, contacts, email and tasks via Outlook.com, and the tasks sync to my iOS devices, something Google Tasks doesn’t do.

So. How is it?


The first thing I noticed is that Microsoft’s apps are maddeningly inconsistent. The iPhone version of Office (it’s not split into separate apps like the iPad’s Word, Excel and Powerpoint) has a nifty feature for viewing the “outline” of a document and jumping back and forth via headers. This is hella useful on a small screen and just the thing novelists need to quickly get to a particular chapter.

Word for iPad doesn’t do this. Neither does Word Online. So for the platforms where I’d be more likely to edit my manuscript, I’m stuck scrolling through an 80,000 word document. If I want to be able to jump around the document and type comfortably, I need to use the Windows or Mac versions of Word (which I can have on up to five computers).

But okay, maybe I can work around that. What about styles? As both an author-publisher myself and in my business formatting ebooks for others, styles are a must for formatting. Manually applying font styles or adding a discreet page break before chapter headings is something savages do.

The iPhone version doesn’t support styles at all. You can make text bold, italics or underlined, and you can change the text and background colors. But that’s it. The iPad version and the web version do support applying styles. And in opening a .docx file saved from Google Drive in Word Online, I found that the styles I actually wanted weren’t in the style chooser, crowded out instead by loser styles like “Heading 7″ and “Intense Emphasis.” Seriously, who uses those? And oddly, there was no way to change this.

The iPad and web versions of Word don’t allow you to alter or remove styles in any way. The only way to get back to my beloved “Heading 1,” “Heading 2″ and “Normal” was to — stop me if you’ve heard this one — open the file in Word for Windows and edit the styles there. Once I’d done that, the styles I wanted showed up just fine in Word for iPad and Word Online.

So currently, I’m still testing, but I have the sinking feeling that the New Microsoft is still more an idea than reality. Too often I’m sent running back to Windows to do any “real” work. I’m not saying the non-Windows versions of Word are afterthoughts, but they’re certainly not equal citizens, either. 

Next up: Microsoft’s OneNote vs Evernote.